What: The Academy Award Nominees 2006
When 1st Seen: 31 January 2006
Time: 5:50 a.m.
Key: predicted to win / should win
Best motion picture of the year
- Brokeback Mountain (Focus Features)
- Capote (UA/Sony Pictures Classics)
- Crash (Lions Gate)
- Good Night, and Good Luck. (Warner Independent Pictures)
- Munich (Universal & DreamWorks)
Note: Brokeback and Munich were both great films. The scale and scope here, though, has to go to Munich.
Achievement in directing
- Brokeback Mountain (Focus Features) Ang Lee
- Capote (UA/Sony Pictures Classics) Bennett Miller
- Crash (Lions Gate) Paul Haggis
- Good Night, and Good Luck (Warner Independent Pictures) George Clooney
- Munich (Universal and DreamWorks) Steven Spielberg
Note: Same logic as Best Picture
Performance by an actress in a leading role
- Judi Dench in Mrs. Henderson Presents
- Felicity Huffman in Transamerica
- Keira Knightley in Pride & Prejudice
- Charlize Theron in North Country
- Reese Witherspoon in Walk the Line
Note: This is a really difficult category this year because the women were all amazing in their own way. Felicity Huffman’s role was the most difficult to play, however, show I feel she deserves the edge. How many people saw this film? The subject matter was incredibly controversial, and I worry many voters will see her as a television actress which is incredibly unfair. Ms Dench has already won as has Ms Theron. The Academy does like to spread the wealth in this category except when Meryl Streep is up. This leaves us with Ms Witherspoon and Ms Knightley. I give the edge her to Knightley vs. Witherspoon only slightly. Both were outstanding performances. The body of Ms Knightley’s incredible work in a very short period of time, her incredible range, and her future to contribute to the body of great film work is, perhaps, a bit better. So, I give her the edge, although this could exactly why she loses since the voters may see her as having the potential for many, many more nominations.
Performance by an actress in a supporting role
- Amy Adams in Junebug
- Catherine Keener in Capote
- Frances McDormand in North Country
- Rachel Weisz in The Constant Gardener
- Michelle Williams in Brokeback Mountain
Note: Catherine Keener is the gem of Capote in my book. Her portrayal of Harper Lee was the only think I liked about the movie. In this crowd, here acting job is probably only really equalled by Frances McDormand who is stunning in North Country as a dying miner. Still, I feel Rachel Weisz has got to win or there will be a near complete snub of The Constant Gardner which deserves some recognition this year.
Performance by an actor in a leading role
- Philip Seymour Hoffman in Capote
- Terrence Howard in Hustle & Flow
- Heath Ledger in Brokeback Mountain
- Joaquin Phoenix in Walk the Line
- David Strathairn in Good Night, and Good Luck
Note: I think Heath Ledger will win this award, but Joaquin really deserves it between the two. Mr. Ledger was great, Mr. Phoenix was brilliant. Brokeback Mountain is a more important film, so give it Best Picture and focus this award on the best acting.
Performance by an actor in a supporting role
- George Clooney in Syriana
- Matt Dillon in Crash
- Paul Giamatti in Cinderella Man
- Jake Gyllenhaal in Brokeback Mountain
- William Hurt in A History of Violence
Note: This one is almost as difficult as supporting actress. I look to history on this award and see that the Academy usually uses these to supporting categories to recognize unrecognized films. Everyone knows that Cinderella Man was one of the best films of the year. They erred in releasing it in the summer and lost a lot of the spectacle. Was it as good as the rest of the nominees for best picture? Sure, it was as good as Capote wasn’t it? Ah, but it was a boxing movie and we just had all the award go to Million Dollar Baby. The curse of the similar genre—the makers ofAnnapolis should have thought of this and chose to focus on the Naval Academy swim team instead if they had Oscar hopes. In any case, in my view Jake Gyllenhaal deserves this award. He was hands down better than Heath Ledger in the film, and I already said Heath was great. He carried this movie. It was a shame to pitch him as the supporting actor, however I understand the studio’s logic. They’d rather have two nominations than one and Heath has more screen time because it takes a lot more footage to get the story of someone who never says anything across than someone who never stops talking. Anyway, Jake may well lose out to Paul Giamatti because otherwise there will be no awards for Cinderella Man. My dark horse award of all the nominations would be to give this award to Matt Dillon, though, because Crash also deserves an award, and if you want to award someone for acting comebacks and acting way beyond previous expectations, Matt Dillon would be the clear winner.
Best animated feature film of the year
- Howl’s Moving Castle
- Tim Burton’s Corpse Bride
- Wallace & Gromit in the Curse of the Were-Rabbit
Note: Here is one where the choices are so obvious that both the Academy voters and I should be in complete agreement. Did you not see Tim Burton’s Corpse Bride? Well, see it. It is amazing. Of course, I have no idea why Chicken Little didn’t get nominated. You have slots for five films? Or Robots? Or Madagascar? If you put Chicken Little in there, I’d probably have to go for it. I have no clue why it wasn’t more successful. It was hilarious and ingenious nearly to the degree of Monster’s Inc—you put the name Pixar on the same movie and you earn another $100 million on it, as it was it earned, according to The-numbers.com, $133.5 million domestic and $258.5 million worldwide which wasn’t too shabby. Robots also was quite good and deserved, at least, a nomination. I did not see Madagascar, but I heard it was great. So, I don’t know what is up with these other nominations. I think the Academy fell asleep on this one. If you are going to go and create a special category for animated motion pictures because you worry that soon one will beat the a movie with real actors in it for Best Picture, then why would you not nominate five and include some of the best animated films of the year? This makes no sense.
No comments:
Post a Comment